Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 561 - 580
of 20,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2007, 7:05 am
Constitution don't matter, what does? [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 10:07 am
’ I felt like I was living in a body I didn’t recognize," but her best husband in the world, Tom Brady, said "I love you no matter what," and that taught her, "What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
New is important b/c it’s a democratic endorsement. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 7:05 am
Last year, United States Representative Charles B. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
It follows thus that if such a request is submitted in appeal the board has to exercise its discretion under Article 12(4) RPBA and decide whether to admit or not such a request (see the discussion on this topic in T 28/10 [3.2-3], in which also the previous case law of the boards of appeal is discussed). [2.4] The present main request differs from the proprietor’s main request at first instance (which is identical to the 1st auxiliary request on appeal) essentially by the absence of… [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 6:09 am
Rule 54(b) doesn’t even apply:While Rule 54(b) can aid parties with multiple-claim complaints . [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Here, a majority of voters concludes that A and B needn't be treated equally; but the slippage happens because a minority (here, 30%) exhibits a multi-peaked preference by preferring either form of equal treatment (0 or B) to unequal treatment (A). [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:36 am
Don't assume all motorcyclists are speed demons. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
(b) The duration of the marriage. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
As Lord Nicholls observed in Campbell, what the Flitcroft case was actually about wasn’t “disclosure of confidential information which would infringe privacy” but “misuse of private information”. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:45 am
Commonwealth, MAR11, VaSC No. 092395 (deciding that Commonwealth Attorneys can prosecute civil cases of refusing to submit to breath or blood tests) - I tripped over a footnote in which Justice Lemons was kind enough to list civil things that the General Assembly has entrusted to local Commonwealth Attorneys:2.2-3126(B) - conflict of interest opinions3.2-3947(B) - enjoining pesticide violations3.2-4505(2) - apple injunctions3.2-4749 - farm produce injunctions8.01-622.1(B)… [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
A further repetition of the process of Example 8 performed by the appellant, the experimental details of which were provided in Annex B of letter dated 8 March 2013, confirmed said conclusion. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 2:57 am
It doesn't matter what school you are in--it will be hard. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 2:14 pm
First, let's say that I don't think b applies as it is always possible for an in-house counsel to blog personally, without dealing with his daily job. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:17 am
(b) The appeal was admissible, essentially for the reasons set out in the provisional opinion of the Board. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Consequently, this feature leaves the actual subject-matter covered by the claim in doubt. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm
In this case, as Ling’s ’404 application was entitled under § 120 to the benefit of the ’413 application for the subject matter of claim 31, it was “an application” for purposes of § 135(b)(2) as well. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
A process for removing nitrogen oxides from flue gas issuing from a regenerator of a fluidized catalytic cracking unit wherein the flue gas is cleaned of substantial amounts of dust in the regenerator, the process comprising the steps of:a) directing the flue gas into a tertiary cyclone separator and separating the solids therefrom so that not more than 250mg/Nm3 of solids exit in an overflow from the tertiary cyclone separator and causing between 0.5% and 6% percentage of flue gas entering the… [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:13 am
Country B will likewise to claim at least $75. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 3:01 pm
A confusing matter, which, the court noted, could have been avoided if the legislature chose to use serial commas (“A, B, or C” rather than “A, B or C”) as a drafting technique (contrary to Maine practice, which seems to cut against serial commas): We would be remiss not to note the clarifying virtues of serial commas that other jurisdictions recognize. [read post]
