Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 561 - 580
of 21,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2011, 1:26 pm
The Appeals Court said, "We reversed the district court's prior dismissal and remanded the matter to the court with specific instructions. [read post]
7 May 2020, 3:19 pm
[Kelly v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 1:00 am
That doesn’t matter to me. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:56 am
In Diamond Power Int'l v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 8:52 am
The principle that all legislative powers must be limited likely matters to the five conservative justices. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
The petition, however, was deemed withdrawn and the matter closed. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:47 am
The celebrated case of Mingo Logan Coal Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This part of the project discusses why the “difficulty” of constitutional amendment under Article V matters. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:01 am
In Skidmore Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
In Moore v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Massachusetts, et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471and other decisions, the Appellate Division explained that judicial review of arbitration awards is extremely limited, and an arbitration award may be vacated by a court only in the event "an arbitrator exceeds his or her power" and arbitrators exceed their power only in the event the award issued "violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated… [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:03 am
Palanitkar and Ors. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 1:01 am
In Hite v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:08 am
Kennedy's vote in Ricci v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:02 am
The context matters, and the context here—again, while extraordinary—is narrow. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz reads the modern Court from Wickard to Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Co. v. [read post]