Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 3,109
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Among auto manufacturers, there would be a total of 24 different options of long-haul truck models in the next three years. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Major Connecticut-based corporations are decamping to other states, reducing their in-state footprint, or being acquired by out-of-state firms, including, most recently, the merger of the Massachusetts-based Raytheon Company with the Connecticut-based United Technologies, with the new company to be headquartered in the Boston area.[16] Here too, relocations are not primarily to the Sun Belt, but toward places like New York City, Boston, and… [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
A battery recycling and manufacturing company with a unionized production and maintenance workforce notified those employees of its intention to begin processing requests for FMLA through an off-site third-party administrator rather than through its onsite human resources department. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
To date, though the pandemic is a global health and economic phenomenon, the pandemic-related securities litigation activity has been limited to the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am by Yuanyou (Sunny) Yang
Several trade associations gave feedback, and raised five major concerns: The broad scope of the rule; The inability of many contractors to meet the August 2020 compliance deadline; (3) Whether the rule will apply outside the United States; Whether the term “use” would include a reseller’s commercial sales of prohibited products, thus preclu [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:58 am by Jesse Mondry
Supreme Court to Rule on Important International Arbitration Issue, I wrote about an important international arbitration matter pending before the United States Supreme Court on whether foreign companies doing business in the United States can arbitrate a dispute with an American company. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
-listed companies domiciled or based outside the United States (Phoenix Tree Holdings Ltd. and iAnthus Holdings). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 2:47 am
Mondelēz International, Inc. manufactures and distributes those products by its various family members.Ominously for Retrobrands’ petition, the Board started its discussion by stating that, “CHICLETS branded gum has been sold in the United States continuously by various predecessors-in-interest since around 1900. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 10:45 am by Thomas Key
The company markets those designs to clothing manufacturers; although some designs are marketed publicly, others are created specifically for and marketed exclusively to a single customer for at least a few months. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Heasley).Non-ownership: Opposer claimed that the mark was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, a California corporation, and therefore that JY Insyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Many of the medical, pharmaceutical, and manufacturing companies in which Short and his wife hold stock have been directly affected by or involved in the work of the Coronavirus Task Force, chaired by Pence. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]