Search for: "March v. Cross" Results 561 - 580 of 3,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
  The Court, however, requested a response on Dec. 6, 2007, and granted review on March 17. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The other Carr also has a cross-petition (and picked up new counsel since our last installment). [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 3:19 am
Summary of Decision issued March 6, 2007[SPECIAL NOTE: This opinion uses the "Universal Citation. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 11:31 am by Micah Buchdahl
There were hot-button issues sitting on my desk, and the equally red-hot debate over making the first substantial changes to the Rules of Professional Conduct related to law firm marketing since Bates v Arizona in 1977. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:16 am
Noble"The state's cross-examination of a defendant on the late filing of his alibi notice is consistent with his right to remain silent when such cross-examination is designed to highlight inconsistencies between the alibi notice and defendant's trial testimony. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“ Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), entered on or about March 23, 2021, which, upon reargument, denied plaintiff’s motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant that portion of plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment dismissing defendant’s affirmative defenses, except for overbilling, and to grant that branch of defendant’s cross-motion that asserted… [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:34 am by Stephen Bilkis
The second petition also contained an allegation about March 22, 2007. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The plaintiffs cross-moved pursuant to CPLR 3025(b) for leave to amend the complaint. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:42 am by Barry Eagar
Case: Rosemin Pty Ltd v Gasp Jeans Chadstone Pty Ltd FCA 228Date: 16 March 2010This case does not have any interpretative content. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
The Appellate Division, Second Department, in its March 6, 2019 decision in Schatz v. [read post]