Search for: "Matter of Barry V."
Results 561 - 580
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 2:40 pm
v=7W33HRc1A6c [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Worker hired on fixed-term agreement has it extended four times In Steele v. the Corporation of the City of Barrie, the plaintiff was hired by the City on a fixed-term two-year employment agreement. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Several readers, of whom Barry Teobald was first, have been nudging the IPKat to tell the world about Facebook's application to register the word FACE as a US trade mark. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:45 am
Gallo Winery v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ____ Q: What is the subject matter of 17 USC 119? [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:46 am
As set forth in Exhibit V, Medifast’s stock also had a history of substantial declines. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 5:08 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Caperton v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 10:00 pm
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDATHE FLORIDA BAR,Complainant,v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Judge Alex Kozinski's scathing dissent in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
Maxwell v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 1:28 am
The law on this was considered by the Supreme Court in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38; [2020] AC 629; [2019] WLR(D) 462 (29 July 2019), when it reiterated that (a) the civil courts have power under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR r 5.4C(2)) to disclose documents held by the court to a non-party, if used or disclosed at or for the trial; and (b) the more senior courts (ie High Court and above) have power under their… [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” The court thus distinguishes Walker v. [read post]
