Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 561 - 580
of 30,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2021, 12:00 am
I'll respond promptly unless I'm in court. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 4:20 am
Paul Fire Foundation, their impact on the community, or how you can get involved, visit their website at: www.stpaulfirefoundation.org The post Lindsey Rowland Named Board Member of St. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
A copy of the petition, together with all of petitioner's affidavits, exhibits, and other supporting papers, except a memorandum of law (unless the appeal is a charter school location/co-location appeal pursuant to section 276.11 of this Title, in which case the memorandum of law shall be served with the petition) or an affidavit in support of a reply, shall be personally served upon each named respondent, or, if a named respondent cannot be found upon… [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:54 am
Complainant has not proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent was not likely relying on the geographic connotations of ‘Atlantic Station’ when it registered the Domain Names. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:18 am
“Respondent states that several companies have approached it to purchase the Domain Name, some being prepared to pay a six-figure sum for the name. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:19 am
Toggas, D2001-0101 (WIPO March 30, 2001) the Policy “necessarily implies that Complainant’s rights predate Respondent’s registration . . . of the domain name. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
Yet the law firm lost even thought the cybersquatter failed to respond to the complaint! [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm
Assistant Secretary of Commerce Lawrence Strickling urged the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which works under several contracts with the Commerce Department, to address concerns of potential costs to brand owners and “predatory cyber crime to consumers. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 9:00 am
What name and address must be placed on the product label? [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 9:00 am
What name and address must be placed on the product label? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 2:04 am
Victoria Woo known by her stage name “Kianna Dior” prevailed over Christian Dior while other Dior respondents forfeited the disputed domain names. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc.) the respondents “paid Internet search engines such as Google or Yahoo for the use of competitors’ names as a keyword“. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
The cancellation proceeding was instituted in September 2004 naming Yellowtop as the Respondent, and the Board sent notice of the proceeding to Yellowtop. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:32 pm
And yesterday and today at National Review Online's "Bench Memos" blog, Ed Whelan had posts titled "Alan Dershowitz's Curious Denials" and "Alan Dershowitz Responds. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:23 am
The Facts of the Case A police officer was responding to an emergency call at a hotel for a person who was unconscious. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:24 am
Under the substantial evidence standard, all conflicts in the evidence must be resolved in favor of the respondent and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged to uphold the lower court’s decision. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:37 am
Complainant pointed out that it offers similar service without charge, that there are other competitive vendor-consultants who use appropriate domain names and “there are other domain names available [to Respondent] that do not incorporate its WALMART marks, which would allow Respondent to carry out its business intentions” and that Complainant itself. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
” Tuckahoe responded, advising Eschmann that she was not entitled to the position[1] as it was not more than 50 percent similar to her former position and [2] that, in any event, the position was filled in August 2013, at which time Eschmann’s name was no longer on the PEL. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
They are no less able to have their claims settled or adjudicated following respondent’s suit than if her suit had never been filed at all. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:24 am
Nowadays, the only good reasons to name the co-respondent are to prove the adultery (unusual - if the respondent does not admit the adultery, then the co-respondent is unlikely to do so), or so that the petitioner can claim costs against the co-respondent, although there are unfortunately instances when the petitioner merely wants to name the co-respondent out of spite or revenge. [read post]
