Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 11:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:02 am
SEC v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:02 am
Also available in a printable PDF form, the cheat sheet was created by non-Google employees Nancy Blachman and Jerry Peek, who keep it updated regularly (last update: February 27, 2012).For example, look at the helpful list of restrictions available for query words below: In one instance, by using the “allintext:” restriction, I was able to limit my original search results from 2,620 to 75 (example search terms: allintext: “lawson v.… [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:55 am
On April 11, 2012, the SEC issued FAQs to provide guidance regarding Title V and Title VI of the JOBS Act. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 1:06 pm
Saporito v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:06 am
Saporito v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:11 am
This jibes with the District Court of Arizona holding in SEC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:42 pm
Title V and Title VI of the JOBS Act amend Section 12(g) and Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act as follows: The holders of record threshold for triggering Section 12(g) registration for issuers (other than banks and bank holding companies) has been raised from 500 or more persons to either (1) 2,000 or more persons or (2) 500 or more persons who are not accredited investors. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 8:39 am
Within a year of an IPO, the EGC would report three years’ worth of financial statements; (iv) Provides exceptions to rules on mandatory audit firm rotation; (v) Exempts EGCs from certain requirements under Dodd-Frank legislation such as the say on pay requirements and disclosure of median compensation ratios of… [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:39 am
Within a year of an IPO, the EGC would report three years’ worth of financial statements; (iv) Provides exceptions to rules on mandatory audit firm rotation; (v) Exempts EGCs from certain requirements under Dodd-Frank legislation such as the say on pay requirements and disclosure of median compensation ratios of… [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:11 am
Expansion of Protected Activity Under Sarbanes-Oxley Continues from Epstein Becker & Green: Using Zinn v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 pm
Study on the impact of State Blue Sky laws on Regulation A offerings.TITLE V--PRIVATE COMPANY FLEXIBILITY AND GROWTHSec. 501. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 2:32 pm
The ARB’s March 28, 2012 decision in Zinn v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 10:32 am
The ARB’s March 28, 2012 decision in Zinn v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 9:59 am
Any firm that goes public already has up to two years after its IPO to comply with certain Sarbanes-Oxley auditing requirements. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Compliance with the auditor attestation requirement of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is not required for the period that a company remains an EGC. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
The emerging growth companies would still be required to comply with SEC-mandated quarterly and annual disclosures, but they would be exempted from the auditor attestation provisions of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for a longer transition period, up to five years, instead of the current transition period of two years. [read post]
