Search for: "People v Trump" Results 561 - 580 of 4,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
Trump * Another Government Impermissibly Censors Constituents on Facebook–Robinson v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:03 am by JT
Since we have a  HIPPA compliant judge this term in the Bronx Civil Court, I found a case, albeit criminal, which while not on point, shows the limits of HIPPA: People v Jaikaran,2012 NY Slip Op 03464 (2d Dept. 2012) “Here, the hospital records were properly certified (see CPLR 4518[a]; CPL 60.10)  [MY NOTE: DID THEY MEAN [...] [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
  Trump’s legal team is arguing that the suit cannot proceed because a state court cannot exercise jurisdiction over a sitting President; in their view, Clinton v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 4:13 pm by Amy Howe
The justices will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Greg Stohr reports for Bloomberg that  the “Supreme Court is again poised to test the bounds of Donald Trump’s presidential powers, this time in a politically charged clash over the fate of 700,000 people who were brought into the country illegally as children,” in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:12 am by Steve Lubet
  The piece compares the Trump-Sessions policy of zero tolerance toward border crossers to the SCOTUS opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am by Melissa Crow
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
” Steve Elster sought to register the mark “Trump too small” for use on T-shirts to convey a political message about the then-President Donald Trump. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
In the first paragraph of Roberts’ opinion in Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
Here are a few preliminary thoughts about the Court’s decision yesterday in Trump v. [read post]