Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 561 - 580
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Here are the facts:"[Officer] Estrada testified that on May 15, 1992, while undercover, he observed defendant Rodrigo [] Martinez hand another man a brown bindle of marijuana in return for what was later determined to be $8. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
May 2 was the gang’s 'birthday' or 'gang day.' On May 2, 2011, Diane T. was working as a prostitute. . . . [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
Particularly when -- as in the present case -- the split involves a fact pattern that's fairly prevalent.But this may be one of those rare cases when leaving things as they are may well be just fine.Today's opinion says something that sounds pretty right (to me, at least). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am
A deeper look at some of the cases interpreting these rules may be helpful. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:38 am
Something that we may well be unable to fix. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am
” In May 2017, LinkedIn sent hiQ a C&D and blocked its IP addresses. hiQ sought relief from the courts. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 7:57 am
People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:42 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:57 am
When the court reconvened, the following proceedings occurred: “THE COURT: Recalling People vs. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:00 pm
And I hope both that Detective Serrata does not hear the end of this one, as well as that the other people involved in this controversy know they did the right thing and would do it again. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:57 pm
Boundaoui v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:30 pm
It may even result in criminal charges, as it did in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 5:49 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:14 pm
Murray sought a hearing pursuant to People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:42 pm
Bloch v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 12:44 pm
Boyd v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:27 am
Smartsource v Information Commissioner + 19 other parties [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC) 23rd November 2010 – read judgment Ibsen’s Enemy of the People has Dr Stockmann complaining to his Norwegian municipality about contamination of its water supply. [read post]
