Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 561 - 580 of 39,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 A good example of a situation in which the five day period for a § 190.50 motion may be extended is provided by People v Prest, 105 AD2d 1078 [4th Dept 1984]. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:06 pm by Harvey Weiner
The people of Maryland can amend the state constitution. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
The modern formulation of the ex post facto rule may be found in the three leading Supreme Court cases, Weaver v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
16 May 2017, 9:07 am by Phil Dixon
A deeper look at some of the cases interpreting these rules may be helpful. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
” In May 2017, LinkedIn sent hiQ a C&D and blocked its IP addresses. hiQ sought relief from the courts. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
   And while some Justices enticed Clement into conceding that a state’s people may act to vary the lawmaking process somewhat, he steadfastly refused to accept that the legislature could be forced entirely to the sideline on the redistricting question. [read post]
10 May 2024, 1:07 pm
(Not that the other had a field day either, obviously.)Divorces sometimes bring out the absolute worst in people, sadly. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
  And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]