Search for: "People v. Peters"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Gardner, Peter L. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:06 pm
To my surprise, there's no lawyer or judge in California listed with that name; the closest you get is a "Peter Andrew Kim," which I'm fairly confident is someone else. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:19 am
For many people struggling with debt, using a credit card has been a means to get by. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:22 am
Peters (Domestic Violence) Swinomish Tribal Community v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:21 am
However, the landmark case of People v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:19 am
Peters (Domestic Violence) Swinomish Tribal Community v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:19 am
Peters (Domestic Violence) Swinomish Tribal Community v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:39 am
[1]McKinley v BC Tel [2] Jones v Tsige [3] Hart v Parrish The post Tape Recording Workplace Discussions appeared first on Peter A. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:05 am
In Matter of W.K. v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Mr Wright has sued a number of people in the crypto industry in an apparent campaign to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious and anonymous inventor of Bitcoin. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
That might also be true when there are only 3 elements, but it’s more likely w/1000.Peter Golder, Aaron Yeater, & Mike Schreck, Dartmouth College, Analysis Group, & Analysis Group, Assessing Trademark Strength without SurveysSecondary meaning: in search of a more rigorous way to deal with the qualitative aspects of an inquiry. [read post]
1 May 2019, 9:06 am
Alley’s case in State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The second case was ViiV Healthcare v Minister of Health, where a judicial review was filed earlier this year. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 10:43 am
The case, Wallace v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am
Interim Judgment On March 27, 2019, the SPC IP Tribunal issued its first decision in a patent case Valeo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 1:23 am
The ‘license’ lets stratagem was knocked on the head by the 1985 case of Street v. [read post]
