Search for: "People v. Williams" Results 561 - 580 of 4,934
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 3:38 pm by Lawrence Solum
William Robert Dailey (Notre Dame Law) has posted Who is the Attorney General's Client? [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Williams, 553 U.S. 285 (2008), builds on this principle: "Offers to engage in illegal transactions are categorically excluded from First Amendment protection," id. at 297 (citing Giboney v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 10:17 am by INFORRM
Print v digital The downward trend in print circulation that all publishers are battling has gathered pace in the past decade. [read post]
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
It came after the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am by Lawrence Lessig, Jason Harrow
The legal theory that would allow state legislatures to go rogue and appoint electors without regard for the popular vote rests on an argument made by Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:33 am
Williams, 249 A.D.2d 343, 344, 670 N.Y.S.2d 893 [2d Dept 1998], lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 883 [1998]; see also People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:18 pm
On September 1, 2009, the Court of Appeals published a per curiam opinion in People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:11 am
I illustrate in Part V how several prominent American clergymen, following Locke and Sidney, rejected as impossible the divine and supposedly infallible status of rulers. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 4:41 am by Russ Bensing
  Williams gives some support to it, and the upcoming decision in State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:00 am by Michael Risch
Fast-forward to a relatively huge copyright jury verdict in the Williams v. [read post]