Search for: "Pharmaceutical Associates, Inc." Results 561 - 580 of 1,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  Such vaccine litigation (Bexis’ first exposure to a pharmaceutical mass tort) was ultimately adjudged so inimical to the public health that Congress prohibited it. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am by Schachtman
” Peter Lee, “Patent Law and the Two Cultures,” 120 Yale L.J. 2, 4 (2010); see also Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm by Steven Boutwell
Former EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson stated that she was “not aware of any water contamination associated with recent drilling” in the Marcellus Shale. [7]  State and regulatory agencies have conducted investigations and have yet to find proof that chemicals injected during fracturing operations have reached freshwater aquifers. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:00 am
SigmaPharm Laboratories, LLC, Oppositions Nos. 91196802 and 91196807 [Section 2(d) oppositions to registration of the marks SigmaPharm, and SigmaPharm Laboratories, and SigmaPharm Laboratories & Design, for various pharmaceutical preparations and for pharmaceutical research and development services, in view of the registered marks SIGMA-TAU PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and the Design Mark shown below right, for "pharmaceutical products for use in the… [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
At Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in the patent case Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:58 am
Ortho McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc., No. 3:12 oe 40001, 2014 U.S. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
Supreme Court oral argument in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
Nike, Inc., the California Supreme Court in finding Nike’s speech commercial, looked at three factors: (1) the speaker; (2) the intended audience; and (3) the content of the message (i.e. is the representation about [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Association of Maryland Pilots 13-1268Issue: Whether, when applying the Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 10:02 pm by News Desk
The defendants, who ran an operation known as Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals Inc., continued to deceptively market weight-loss products in violation of a 2008 federal court order, with unsubstantiated claims such as “rapid fat loss,” “fat burner,” “thermogenic” and “curbs the appetite. [read post]