Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 36,585
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
Tompkins and United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
In Tutti Mangia Italian Grill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:00 am
The Court rejected Kentucky’s contention that the various public policy rationales the State advanced in support of segregation laws justified these laws as valid uses of the police power. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
Champion famously held that Congress had the power to ban the sale of lottery tickets across state lines under the Commerce power. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 8:32 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
Of course, under United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:20 am
In Liu v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:05 pm
United States—the article argues that the tax must satisfy the rules applicable to the taxing power. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 12:41 pm
Rick cites Davis v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Law of the case Omar Johnson, appellant, who is presently serving a life sentence for first-degree murder, filed a pro se pleading he captioned “Motion to Am end Under Rule 4-345, Sentencing Revisory Power of the Court” with the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 8:00 am
And they refused to infer it from the Takings Clause either, because the Clause was not intended to expand Congress's power beyond the District and territories.Eminent domain aside, the notion of great powers is increasingly relevant after National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:49 am
” J.A. 2759:13–14.The question of Dennis related to the power of the Florida government todictate patent ownership, but then there was a question of the power of the federal government to do so.LBE wrote:In Stanford v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 6:41 am
Our particular constitutional system makes this kind of change possible because Article V amendments, particularly with respect to the powers of government, are quite rare and the powers of foreign affairs have generally not been addressed by courts. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
