Search for: "Reynolds v. United States" Results 561 - 580 of 692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by D. Daxton White
Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 83 (2002), the United States Supreme Court determined that the predecessor NASD six year rule was a procedural matter that is presumptively for this Panel to decide and is not a substantive limitation. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 5:10 am by Lawrence Solum
Virginia State Board of Elections86 and property ownership in Kramer v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:26 pm by INFORRM
A public interest defence which could only be rebutted by proof of malice would not strike a fair balance (and, as the position in the United States shows, would not make reduce litigation or make it cheaper). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
What it was attempting to do was to make the point that the Supreme Court had never come close to offering a cogent analysis of what it actually meant by “one person/one vote” and therefore the mantra of “equality” in voting power, which, after all, was the basis of Reynolds v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by Katherine Pompilio
Reynolds traced the influence of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am by John Elwood
Though the plan created districts roughly equal in total population, the appellants contend that it nevertheless contains “gross disparities in voters or potential voters,” and thereby runs afoul of the Fourteenth Amendment’s “one person, one vote” principle under Reynolds v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Surveillance On 12 September 2023, The European Court of Human Rights delivered its judgment in Wieder and Guarnieri v. the United Kingdom (nos. 64371/16 and 64407/16). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:58 pm by Don T. Hibner, Jr.
  However, unmentioned and undiscussed is the line of authority stemming from United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:12 pm
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 537 F.3d 1357, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
(Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents US Commerce Secretary Locke on patents (Intellectual Property Watch) Innovation with lead recovery if patent system allows (IP Watchdog) ‘Judicial Business of the United States Courts’ report – only 3.8% of all patent cases reach court stage (Innovationpartners) Did you know... existing English language translations of documents must be produces during discovery at the ITC? [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Reynolds, 452 So. 2d 48 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) (plaintiffs were not entitled to an award of lost profits because they failed to plead special damages). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am by Victor Kattan
As law professor John Reynolds explains, “With the dismantling of apartheid in South Africa the special committee was dissolved by the UN. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]