Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 561 - 580
of 62,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2012, 6:05 am
Indian Industries d/b/a Escalade Sports v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:33 am
Ravichandran and another v Lewisham London Borough Council [2010] EWCA Civ 755; [2010] WLR (D) 170 “An offer of accommodation made by a local authority in discharge of its housing duty under s 193(7) of the Housing Act 1996 had two requirements: the accommodation had to be suitable and the offer reasonable for the applicant to accept. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:27 am
Regina (Z) v Croydon London Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 59; [2011] WLR (D) 29 “Where a court was considering whether to grant permission to proceed with a claim for judicial review of a local authority’s decision in an age assessment case the court should ask whether the material before it raised a factual case which, taken at its highest, could not properly succeed in a contested factual hearing. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 1:44 am
M v Hackney London Borough Council and others [2011] EWCA Civ 4; [2011] WLR (D) 2 “A hospital trust was entitled to rely upon an application for the admission for treatment of a patient under the Mental Health Act 1983 which appeared to comply with section 6(3) of the Act as being a lawfully made application pursuant to the provisions of the Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 1:48 am
Enron Coal Services Ltd (in liquidation) v English Welsh & Scottish Railway Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 647; [2009] WLR (D) 224 “The jurisdiction of the Competition Appeal Tribunal under s 47A of the Competition Act 1998 was limited to the determination of follow-on claims for damages based on a finding by a regulator of infringement of [...] [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:00 pm
The case is ASARCO LLC v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
In Cubist v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 2:46 am
Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2010] EWHC 730 (Pat); [2011] WLR (D) 111 “The court would not award compensation under a cross-undertaking for the loss sustained by an unlawful business or where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking had to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss, provided the unlawfulness was sufficiently serious to engage the ex turpi causa rule. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:07 am
MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH (Case C-316/09); [2011] WLR (D) 159 “The dissemination on a website by a pharmaceutical undertaking of information relating to medicinal products available on medical prescription only, which consisted in the reproduction of the packaging, and in the literal and complete reproduction of the package leaflet or summary of the product’s characteristics, was not contrary to article 88(1)(a) of Parliament and Council… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
R (JS (Sri Lanka)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 15; [2010] WLR (D) 79 “An asylum seeker was excluded from protection under the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) (Cmd 9171), pursuant to art 1F(a), if there were serious reasons for considering him voluntarily to have contributed in a significant way to an organisation’s ability to pursue the purpose of committing war crimes or crimes against humanity,… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 2:28 am
ENE Kos 1 Ltd v Petroleo Brasileiro SA [2010] EWCA Civ 772; [2010] WLR (D) 173 “A shipowner who withdrew his vessel from a charterer’s service for non-payment of hire while cargo was on board the vessel and required the charterer to remove the cargo from the vessel, was not entitled to remuneration, in the absence of accident, emergency or necessity, unless expressly or impliedly agreed. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:48 pm
(Veera v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 9:59 pm
FTC: Texas Federal Court Strikes Down FTC's Prohibition on Non-CompetesAmarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is Jon D. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:36 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia’s decision to overturn USCIS’s denial (on Specialty Occupation grounds) in RELX, Inc. d/b/a/ LexisNexis USA, and Subhasree Chatterjee v. [read post]
18 Mar 2007, 7:26 am
LEXIS 18322 (D. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
S., at ___ (slip op., at 4); see Graham County Soil & Water Conservation Dist. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:17 am
RICHARD D. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am
Introduction On 8 June 2016 the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Bailey & v Angove’s PTY Ltd [2016] UKSC 47, in which it was asked to consider the effect which terminating an agency has on the authority of the agent to collect debts owed to the principal. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 6:36 am
1–800 Contacts, Inc. v. [read post]
