Search for: "SANDERS v. STATE" Results 561 - 580 of 938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Thirty-one states prevent people on parole or probation from casting ballots.Four states permanently bar ex-inmates from voting and do not allow restoration of that right, while eight others disenfranchise only people who have committed particularly egregious kinds of crimes.Sunday’s court decision striking down new barriers erected to limit the number of Florida’s previously disenfranchised population from voting is admirable, but much more needs to be done to ensure… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
McGhee and Wood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am by Amy Howe
  First up is Wittman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
Lawrence Sanders, State University of New York at Buffalo. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm by Jordan Brunner
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in IRAP v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:40 pm by Kalvis Golde
Sanders based on a purported desire to maintain “communities of interest. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce (in support of the petitioner) Amicus brief of the Tax Foundation (in support of the petitioner) __________________ Docket: 07-995 Case name: Sanders v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
Finally, in Part V we'll look at how Baby Ninths protect us at a practical level, but also what their larger lesson is. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Lastly, at Casetext, Shaakirrah Sanders assesses the larger role Justice Anthony Kennedy may now play in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 1:42 am by John Hochfelder
Worthen-Caldwell's attorney argued that $1,860,000 was a reasonable award in view of the $11,500,000 verdict in the case of Sanders v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]