Search for: "STATE v COOL"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,411
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2015, 7:41 am
Additional Resources:Hanco Corporation v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:25 pm
Wednesday, that will come to be known by the first case of the two: FERC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 7:40 am
Nevertheless, the issuance of the recent Fisher v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 3:51 pm
On 15/4/2015, Ms B complained about the suitability of the property, stating that it had taken 2-3 hours to drive there from Islington and that the stairs at the property were not suitable for her wheelchair-confined son. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:20 am
Cool. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
* Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:30 pm
Not cool at all. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
ASEAN is a political and economic organization consisting of 10 member states—Singapore, Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, Thailand, Brunei, Cambodia, Laos, Vietnam and Myanmar. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 12:20 pm
(The cool stuff is always in the footnotes.) [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 4:25 pm
By contrast, in the United States (see Firth v New York, 747 NYS 2d 69 (2002)) and in England (see the notes to section 8 of the Defamation Act 2013), the single-publication rule means a cause of action accrues only when the material is first accessed. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am
Tempers have cooled (a bit) and the media has moved on (for now), so it’s a good time to step back and assess this whole episode, what it means and what its larger importance really is. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
Emerson states that Mr. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:06 pm
Justice Thomas Ruffin's opinion in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
As this Kat is incredibly 'hip' and 'cool', he very much likes to keep his paws on the pulse of today's youth's vernacular. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:03 pm
Supreme Court explained in 1931 in Near v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 1:32 am
Dep’t of State Revenue v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Godard v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:48 pm
Either that'll provide useful guidance, or it'll take me long enough that you'll have cooled off by then. [read post]
