Search for: "Smith v. Young" Results 561 - 580 of 740
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
The Chronic Failure to Control Prisoner Isolation in US and Canadian Law Lisa Kerr, Assistant Professor, Queen’s University Faculty of Law(2015) Queen’s Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 482-530 Excerpt: Introduction, Sections II & V[Footnotes omitted. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 6:56 am by Samuel Bray
Equity's concern with the protection of information can be seen as far back as 1818 and the canonical case of Gee v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am by INFORRM
’ Graham Smith, writing on his Cyberleagle blog, provides a detailed run-down of the implications for internet publication. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Even in the legis. history, Congress discusses White-Smith v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:34 am by Schachtman
Ernst & Young explained the structure of Rule 26 with respect to underlying documents, calculations, and data[7]. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm by Andrew Stine
Detective Young testified that he was assigned as the lead detective in this case. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, September 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Smith, No. 06-3112 In a case addressing the constitutionality of a vehicle impoundment under the Fourth Amendment in circumstances in which there was no standardized policy regarding the impoundment and towing of vehicles, the circuit court rules that the constitutionality of a community caretaking impoundment is judged by directly applying the Fourth Amendment, which protects people against "unreasonable" searches and seizures. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
There are other big cases in the wings and it looks like 2019 will be a bumper year for defamation litigation: Craig McLachlan v Fairfax and the ABC, Chau Chak Wing v Fairfax and the ABC, Ben Roberts-Smith v Fairfax, Sarah Hanson-Young v David Leyonhjelm, John Herron and John Gill v HarperCollins – to mention a handful. [read post]