Search for: "South Carolina v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,538
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Given the statute doesn’t require the states to affirmatively do anything, one could argue that § 1373 resembles not the federal schemes struck down in Printz and New York but rather the statutes upheld in South Carolina v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
” 1996: Researchers at South Dakota State University publish a study showing that 60-day aging is largely ineffectual in reducing levels of E. coli O157:H7 in cheddar cheese. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 2:11 pm
South Carolina Coastal Council, Wisconsin argues that it is not just lot lines, but “all of a state’s laws,” that shape the denominator. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:01 am
In fact, the first Supreme Court Justice, James Wilson, wrote in Chisholm v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:30 am
His attacker was Representative Preston Brooks of South Carolina. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:03 pm
Constitution Amendments IX, X --South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:36 am
We, the jury from the United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
“Does [due process] require a ‘nexus’ between the United States and a non-resident alien to apply to him extraterritorially a federal criminal statute? [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
Good --Notes and Questions --A Note on Legalization of Hierarchies of Law Through Statutes --Constitution of the United States --Indiana Code --Notes and Questions --PruneYard Shopping Center v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm
Canada and United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:48 am
“Even where the Government declines to intervene, ‘the United States is the real party in interest in any [FCA] suit. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:36 am
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, on a rehearing of a case en banc, held in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
Stoughton, University of South Carolina School of Law The Fourth Amendment rules governing police use of force provide little guidance, and even this guidance is often sloppily applied. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:40 am
In 1777, the Executive Council of Georgia authorized the purchase of needed supplies from a South Carolina businessman. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:59 pm
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., the plaintiff was a woman who filed a product liability lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking compensation from the defendants, which allegedly designed or manufactured a Yamaha VXS WaveRunner personal watercraft. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 1:53 pm
The insurance company filed a motion for summary judgment, which the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina at Orangeburg denied. [read post]
