Search for: "State of New York v Johnson" Results 561 - 580 of 1,480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2021, 12:44 pm by Ellis Cose
Anti-Black race riots ripped through Chicago, New York, Washington D.C., and even Elaine, Arkansas. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 5:47 am by Amy Howe
” In the New York Daily News, Juan Gonzalez notes that, in “a startling complaint to the United Nations, Puerto Rico Gov. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:53 am
  Such a guide, contained in a “blister pack,” was held irrelevant (“not properly in this case”) and inadmissible for this reason:  “[t]he information that defendant communicated to Plaintiff is irrelevant under New York’'s ‘learned intermediary doctrine’. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Russell Beck
That issue was most recently addressed by the Western District of New York (a federal district court) in Renaissance Nutrition, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court ruled that its 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 10:39 am by Tia Sewell
The move follows a New York state investigation into Facebook’s use of personal information that was not authorized to be shared with the platform, such as data from personal health apps. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
City of New York, 13-1462, and Pregnancy Care Center of New York v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:18 am by Scott Andrews
Co. of New York, 187 So.2d 152 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ ref'd, 249 La. 470, 187 So.2d 445 (1966); Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:54 am by Clara Spera
The New York Times reports that the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) has its sights set on the second largest dam in the country, the Haditha Dam. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Courthouse News Service also provides background on United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
Johnson, 846 F.2d 279, 282 (5th Cir. 1988) (per curiam); see also New York v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Because we have no information regarding why the briefing is illogical, and because we have addressed the issue raised on appeal, we resist the temptation to issue a show cause order as a New York federal district judge did in Mata v. [read post]