Search for: "State v. Alexander"
Results 561 - 580
of 2,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2009, 9:56 pm
"In Case C-43/08 ZVS Zeitungsvertrieb Stuttgart GmbH v President of the German Patent- und Markenamt the questions asked were very similar. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
United States. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:50 am
James dug out this first disclosure document from the papers of Alexander Hamilton. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:40 am
After a jury convicted Christopher Castillo “of making a threat to injure or kill the President of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:12 am
--As to the 1876 case:--In its 1876 decision in Russell v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 2:53 pm
Today, Governor Rick Scott announced the appointment of three new County Court judges to replace Judges Dawn V. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:14 am
Alexander v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:24 pm
Both offer United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:55 am
Hollowbreast, 425 U.S. 649 (1976); United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
:I wanted to update you on a recent court decision relating to the rules on lawyer advertising recently adopted by the Appellate Divisions.In Alexander v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:12 am
Mnuchin (CARES Act)United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:00 pm
Notable state judicial review under state constitutions in fact predated the Philadelphia Convention and Marbury v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The “Rule of Necessity” permits a tribunal, the members of which could be affected by the decision, to decide a case or controversyPines, et. al. v State of New York, 2014 NY Slip Op 00335, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn deciding an action initiated by Emily Pines and other judges, Supreme Court that held that “the compensation of judges and justices of the Unified Court System of the State of New York was duly increased pursuant to the Laws of… [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:38 am
According to the WSJ Law Blog: “Attorneys in New York should have a bit more creative license after the Supreme Court on Monday decided not to intervene in a case (Alexander v Cahill) that concerned the constitutionality of state rules designed to ban attorney ads that contain unverifiable claims, including the use of nicknames or mottoes that imply an attorney’s ability to obtain results. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Impact of Insolvency of a Party on Pending Arbitration Proceedings in Czech Republic, England and Switzerland and Other Countries Alexander J. [read post]
