Search for: "State v. Armes"
Results 561 - 580
of 11,321
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 10:09 am
” The ASBCA further explained that, under Securiforce Int’l Am., LLC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
As both the Russian Federation and Ukraine are States Parties, the Protocol is straightforwardly applicable to the international armed conflict between them (see Articles 1 and 96). [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
In California v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:54 pm
Lortie explained that the recent US Supreme Court decision of Golan v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the… [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 7:18 pm
They did not apply to arms imported from other states. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:38 pm
An appeal to the 3rd Circuit followed as did New York State Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:25 am
Loretto v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:56 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Villafane stated that a personal handgun is one purchased with the officer’s own money (Tr. 47). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Villafane stated that a personal handgun is one purchased with the officer’s own money (Tr. 47). [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 5:16 am
Armed Forces. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:43 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Mendoza v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Munoz v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:04 am
In R v Stone, 1999 CanLII 688 (SCC), [1999] 2 SCR 290, the Supreme Court of Canada defined automatism as “a state of impaired consciousness. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:56 am
I think these precautions aren't as violative of the threat victims' dignity, because they don't enlist the state on the side of the criminal threatener. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 6:05 am
For the first time in the ICC’s history, in September 2019 a Pre-Trial Chamber recognized charges of gender persecution in Prosecutor v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
But Art.1 states only Congress can borrow. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
The case has similarities to Chevron review in the United States, but without the subsequent developments like the analysis of whether policy is properly promulgated to the agencies, following West Virginia v EPA. [read post]
