Search for: "State v. E. B."
Results 561 - 580
of 10,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 7:10 pm
OPM (D.D.C.) -- holding that Office of Personnel Management properly relied on Exemption 7(E) to withhold computer files containing the source code for agency's Electronic Questionnaires for Investigations Processing (e-Qip) System.Spataro v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 11:06 am
CRAIG GUY; HAROLD E. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:41 pm
§ 6972(a)(1)(B). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
The 9th states that Concepcion v US, 142 S. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
Just like being a caretaker is an element of guilt under (e), so too is not being a caretaker an element of guilt under (e). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 1:06 pm
§ 636(e)(6)(B); The Euclid Chemical Company v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
” FRE 502 (b) – the disclosure does not operate as a waiver in a Federal or State proceeding if the (2) the holder of the privilege or protection took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure; General Privilege Waiver — In SEC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 11:22 am
Eighth Circuit reviews whether a challenged evidence ruling by the trial court was properly preserved for appeal under FRE 103(b); the issue turned on whether the trial court’s ruling was “tentative” or “definitive”; the objecting party holds the burden to clarify the nature of the ruling, in United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:22 am
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(i). [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 10:28 am
The ShowCause order is included as Attachment B to this order.Model Rule 8.4(e) provides that it is professional misconductfor a lawyer to “state or imply an ability to influenceimproperly a government agency or official or to achieveresults by means that violate the Rules of ProfessionalConduct or other law. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:08 am
For example, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Stengart v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 11:00 pm
New Jersey resident Nelson Obus contested a New York State Department of Taxation and Finance determination which found that he owed taxes for maintaining a residential property in the state.Obus filed an administrative review proceeding, pursuant CPLR Article 78, to challenge the determination, but because it was found to be “rational,” and “supported by substantial evidence,” the finding of was upheld by a Tax Appeals Tribunal.Under Tax Law § 605… [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 10:20 pm
Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:59 pm
See State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
Beard v. [read post]
