Search for: "State v. Flow" Results 561 - 580 of 5,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
Dismissal of the racial discrimination claim by the Circuit Court for Baltimore City left pending defendant's motion for summary judgment on the issue of damages for the state law claim. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 8:23 am by Christopher G. Hill
As to the accrual argument, the Court dismissed this argument stating that (1) the claim made by Hensel Phelps was not an action for indemnification that fell within an exception to the statute of limitations, and (2) that the express indemnification provision of the contract was overly broad and sought to indemnify Hensel Phelps from its own negligence in violation of the Uniwest v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
As to the accrual argument, the Court dismissed this argument stating that (1) the claim made by Hensel Phelps was not an action for indemnification that fell within an exception to the statute of limitations, and (2) that the express indemnification provision of the contract was overly broad and sought to indemnify Hensel Phelps from its own negligence in violation of the Uniwest v. [read post]
Entities exempted from the Act include (i) agencies, commissions, districts, etc. of the state or political subdivisions, (ii) nonprofits, (iii) higher education, (iv) national securities associations, (v) financial institutions or data subject to Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA), and (vi) hospitals as defined under Connecticut law. [read post]
10 May 2013, 11:51 am
. -- The Southern District of Indiana has construed the claims of two patents-in-suit in the matter of Endotach LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
At this rate Judges may start seeing skeleton arguments containing flow charts… Sara Mansoori is a barrister at Matrix Chambers specialising in media and information law [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
The States' first argument is that neither Article V of the Constitution nor 1 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
From an economic standpoint, it means political ad dollars will flow on a more geographically diverse basis, ensuring that a larger number of local stations benefit, rather than just those in swing states and swing districts. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm by Barry Winograd
For example, as in Circuit City,Southwest Airlines states that the exemption covers those “actively engaged” in the “flow of goods across borders” through “channels of foreign or interstate commerce. [read post]