Search for: "State v. Irvin"
Results 561 - 580
of 608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 10:18 am
See Bridges v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm
City of Irvine (2004) 119 Cal.App.4th 1261, 1275) and that standard was met. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
The Appellate Division then set out to do what Judge Viscomi had failed to do – look at the proffered opinions and assess whether they followed reasonably and reliably from the expert witnesses’ stated grounds. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Justice Eakin’s most memorable dissent I’m aware of was in Porreco v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
Kuhn, Nossaman LLP, Irvine, California, Dwight H. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:17 pm
In Medtronic v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 10:29 am
"I know they are permissible under the Supreme Court’s 1990 ruling in the Michigan Department of State Police v. [read post]
12 Aug 2018, 2:58 pm
In Blackbird Tech LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm
“Objective reasonableness” is an appropriate touchstone for regulating force, but the ill-informed Graham v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:31 pm
Empire, Koram skilfully tracks, structures the modern British state itself. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:10 pm
Defend the Bay v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:59 pm
Whytock, State Remedies for Human Rights, 98 B.U.L. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Ebay v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Special Issue, 2011, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 11-54Catherine Fisk and Erwin Chemerinsky Duke University School of Law and University of California, Irvine School of Law , Duke University - School of Law , University of California, Irvine School of Law Abstract: In Wal-Mart v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
He relegates to a single brief mention the Supreme Court’s summary affirmance in Bluman v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
