Search for: "State v. James E. Grant" Results 561 - 580 of 916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
§ 2254(e)(1)’s command that an underlying state-court fact determination must be presumed correct; (2) whether the Sixth Circuit violated Section 2254(d)(1) by granting habeas relief on a purportedly unreasonable application of state law; and (3) whether the Sixth Circuit violated § 2254(d)(1) by asserting its own prejudice standard – that a defendant “must only show that he had a substantial defense” – rather than the… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
Lawrence Hurley at Environment & Energy News covers the Court’s recent cert. grant in Arkansas Game and Fish Commission v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
But the Court did grant cert. on the question, even in the absence of a circuit split, and so it's safe to assume at least some Justices thought there might be something to it. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:11 am by Dianne Saxe
  Dianne Saxe and Meredith James This article was prepared for the excellent blog SLAW ©2012 Environmental Law and Litigation. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kiran Bhat
Writing in the Baltimore Sun, Irwin E. [read post]
  For example, in human rights law, a violation will occur where there has been a failure of state protection.[6] Thus, it makes no sense to speak of a human rights violation and a failure of state protection.[7] And even if a human rights violation is taken to be demonstrative of a failure of state protection (which is true in human rights discourse), the Refugee Convention speaks of a state’s inability or unwillingness to protect an applicant. [read post]