Search for: "State v. Lilly"
Results 561 - 580
of 904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2011, 6:33 pm
I have previously commented on Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
Look how long it took Lilly Ledbetter to show she had been discriminated against. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court ruled in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Cir. 1997) (hereinafter, Eli Lilly). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm
. - The United States Supreme Court has issued a decision in Microsoft v. i4i LP, against Microsoft and unanimously reaffirming that patents are presumed to be valid at the standard of clear and convincing. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
” Eli Lilly, 199 F.3d at 1568 (quoting Fiers v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
. - The United States Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
State, 686 S.E.2d 483, 485-86 (Ga. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2010 WL 3489366, at *2 (S.D. [read post]
25 May 2011, 8:52 pm
Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:37 am
Supreme Court decision on the separation of church and state in public schools, McCollum v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am
LEARN IT, LIVE IT, LOVE IT SECURITIZATION The History of Financial Regulation in the United States What is Securitization? [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:54 am
ARUP: Genetic testing patents found to be anticipated and in violation of Lilly written description requirement (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) US: FDA gets the ball rolling on biosimilar/interchangeable biological product user fee program; proposal gives a hat tip to PDUFA while acknowledging the nascent state of the industry (FDA Law Blog) (Patent Docs) Products Citalopram – UK Patents Court disapproving of EPO’s approach to assessment of… [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition for the International Trade Commission Brief in opposition for US Phillips Coroporation Petitioners' reply Title: Eli Lilly and Company v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
” Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:03 pm
" Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
While in Norex Petroleum Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Eli Lilly & Co., 2011 WL 1259650 (W.D. [read post]
