Search for: "State v. Mems"
Results 561 - 580
of 666
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2013, 5:48 am
(That’s the central point of Miller v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am
In Matter of Austin ZZ v Aimee A, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 624156, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:23 am
Kravitz and Eagle v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:23 am
Kravitz and Eagle v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am
In Sinnott v Sinnott, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1901679, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
13 May 2011, 12:57 am
Echostar en banc decision stands (Patently-O) (IPBiz) CAFC confirms Odom’s patent invalid: Gary Odom v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:32 am
New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Dev. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:38 pm
nostní softwarová asociace – Svaz softwarové ochrany v Ministerstvo kultury (IPKat) ECJ rules on scope of fair compensation for private copying exceptions: Padawan SL v Sociedad General de Authores y Editores de España (SGAE) Case C-467/08 (JIPLP) India Patentability of method/process claims- Application of recent US case law to the Indian Patent Act section 3(k) (Spicy IP) Ireland Ireland joins copyright review queue (IPKat) Netherlands Court… [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 1:35 pm
Helen Ellis Mem’l Hosp. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
446/09 Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Lucheng Meijing Industrial Company Ltd, Far East Sourcing Ltd, Röhlig Hong Kong Ltd and Röhlig Belgium NV and C? [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
”), aff’d mem. on other grounds sub nom. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:55 pm
Suarez v. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 9:24 am
Upper Darby Township, No. 05-4546 (Mem. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
” Indian River Mem’l Hosp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 6:31 am
(mem. op.). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot create standing:… [read post]
