Search for: "State v. Outing" Results 561 - 580 of 100,182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2024, 5:27 am by Jacob Ford Ridgeway
For example, there appeared to be agreement that, in general, the party most in favor of active judicial limits on executive action was the party currently out of office. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
(Brian van der Brug / Los Angeles Times) Ryan King, a spokesman for the office of the University of California’s president, Michael V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 10:23 am by David Luban
Under the ICC’s founding principle of complementarity, a case is “inadmissible” if it is being “investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution” (Rome Statute art. 17(1)(a)). [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:52 am by Shane McCall
Section 127.304(i) explicitly states “the decision of the [SBA’s Director for Government Contracting] to decline certification is the final agency decision. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
In other words, Alito is who he always was, and the "Concerned Alumni of Princeton," with their focus on white-male success, was a perfect fit for him.2) When the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decided Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:15 am by Charlie French (Bristows)
Although the Court of Appeal stated in Ocado v AutoStore that the interest of the general public usually arises after a decision is rendered, the position was different in this case as it might be too late for Nicoventures to use the information in the EPO proceedings if access was not granted immediately. [read post]
21 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Final Rule is considerably narrower in scope from the rule the DOL adopted in 2016 (which the Fifth Circuit vacated in its entirety two years later)1 since it limits fiduciary status to recommendations made by persons who effectively hold themselves out as occupying a position of trust and confidence with respect to a retirement investor. [read post]