Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 561 - 580
of 4,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2018, 11:22 am
The first Tunheim email states that “[a]sample is attached,” but we must rely onMr. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 6:59 pm
Cir. 1990) (stating that “apparatus claimscover what a device is, not what a device does”). [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:16 am
Concerning the correspondence between the colour sample and the description, the Court referred to Red Bull v EUIPO (case C-124/18 P, IPKat here), in which the CJEU found that the description must serve to clarify the subject matter and scope of protection sought. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
The California Supreme Court recently announced its decision in Duran v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
I saw this opinion, California v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:46 am
I saw this opinion, California v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:53 am
Montana’s straightforward law went into effect two and a half years before California’s landmark privacy law, CalECPA, codified similar protections for location data—and five years before the Supreme Court, in Carpenter v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:02 pm
In Barbuto v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:57 am
See State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 9:04 am
Under a drug-testing procedure, Holland had to provide a urine sample within a three-hour window. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:01 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
FL1: Tip of gun at school required police to act, and moving defendant from cafeteria was reasonable
2 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am
Review and clarification by high court sorely needed [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus and Patrick Moran on Cato amicus brief in Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:56 pm
The case is Lee Oskar Levitin, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 2:00 pm
” Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 1:19 pm
The report analyzes errors within six of the seven opinions in the sampling period; a seventh will be described in a separate article.A sobering error within the sampling period involved Shelby County v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 7:36 am
Law enforcement in this case, Missouri v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Our amicus in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 8:32 am
On January 7, 2011, the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeals released its opinion in State v. [read post]
