Search for: "State v. Witt"
Results 561 - 580
of 643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 6:47 am
It covers all types of imports and exports of products.[2] Any national measure enacted by Member States which has the effect of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, trade in the internal market is to be considered as having an effect equivalent to quantitative restrictions.[3] The Court of Justice of the European Union [“CJEU”] has explained that national measures subjecting the internal trade of goods to prior authorization restrict access to the market… [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
They implicate fundamental questions about the role of courts in the United States’s constitutional structure. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
Trump had refused to criticize Russia on the campaign trail, praising President Vladimir V. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:00 pm
For an outline of the proposition, see the State of California’s voter website. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:00 am
Benjamin Wittes linked to it here. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 9:18 am
A similar dispute arose later in the Djibouti v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:40 am
So far, only one such trial has taken place, U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Furthermore, the arbitrary choice to exclude two major telecom equipment providers on the basis of unsubstantiated allegations of foreign government influence, severely upsets the desired balance between the free movement of goods and a State’s security interests. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 5:44 am
In other words, assume countries A and B have concluded a PTA in accordance with Article V GATS. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am
John Witte Jr, Canopy Forum: Religious Freedom in the Western Legal Tradition. [read post]
