Search for: "Stephens v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 6,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2021, 6:31 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 20–5715, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a statement, in which Justice Neil M. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:40 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Kuehne & Ors v Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 34 (26 January 2012) Mugweni v NHS London [2011] EWCA Civ 20 (26 January 2012) AA (Iraq), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 23 (24 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Rehman v Brady, The Estate of & Anor [2012] EWHC 78 (QB) (25 January 2012) Bennett v Stephens &… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:43 am
Supreme Court appeared to be warning the entire legal system against precisely this course of conduct in City of Ontario v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:24 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit today issued its ruling in Irons v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Supreme Court Justice who authored the opinion in Winans v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:05 pm
Beware the "see also" cite: Today's oral argument in Wilkie v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Finally, in the midst of Chinese exclusion, the Supreme Court handed down the most significant citizenship case it ever decided, United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 4:02 pm by Amanda Pickens
Here is a recap of October’s filings: Stephens, et. al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Nassau County Arrest Lawyers, Nassau County Drug Possession Lawyers and Stephen Bilkis & Associates are experts in the fields of law mentioned in the case above. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:31 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, this ground was without merit as a deficiency in the chain of custody did not affect the admissibility but only affected the weight of the evidence as stated in the People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d at 494. [read post]