Search for: "Strong v. Georgia" Results 561 - 580 of 718
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am by Jeff Gamso
Georgia, was argued in the Supreme Court by Anthony Amsterdam. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:21 am by Steve Hall
Hull -- included a strong 29-page dissent by Hull, who said that the U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:40 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Some fair use myths but often have a strong pedigree in older case law. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
World Pac Int'l AG (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Georgia: ITC deterimination of invalidity does not relieve obligations under earlier settlement and consent decree admitting validity of patent: Tillotson Corp. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 1:09 pm
Relying on these and other factors from Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Relying on these and other factors from Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 8:43 am by John Elwood
The Georgia Attorney General counters in his opp that the Eleventh Circuit’s decision is correct under a straightforward application of Strickland v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
Thus, we must reweave the torn fabric of rural America with thread strong enough to withstand the inevitable ravages of time. [read post]
9 May 2010, 3:06 am by Adam Wagner
For example, in Georgian Labour Party v Georgia, at para 155 the Court said: The Court does not rule out that the applicant party, as a legal entity (see Russian Conservative Party of Entrepreneurs and Others, cited above, § 102, and Kommersant Moldovy v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 12:21 pm by Victoria VanBuren
Strong Although the decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]