Search for: "Sullivan v. Day"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2013, 1:33 pm
First, the court regarded a prior opinion, Sullivan v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"Under FOIL, all government records are presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officer[s] Law § 87 (2)" (Matter of Aron Law PLLC v Sullivan County, 214 AD3d 1186, 1188 [3d Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Cohen v Alois, 201 AD3d 1104, 1105 [3d Dept 2022]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"Under FOIL, all government records are presumptively open for public inspection and copying unless they fall within one of the enumerated exemptions of Public Officer[s] Law § 87 (2)" (Matter of Aron Law PLLC v Sullivan County, 214 AD3d 1186, 1188 [3d Dept 2023] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Cohen v Alois, 201 AD3d 1104, 1105 [3d Dept 2022]). [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 6:32 am
Mr Stenhouse did not have a great day out. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Day. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:06 pm
The Judge struck out the possession claim on that basis, but granted permission to appeal.The issue was that there can be no prescribed form or manner of requesting a review, as per Sullivan J (as he then) in R (on the application of Chalfat) v London Borough of Tower Hamlets [2006] EWHC 313 (Admin) at [16]. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:06 am
The judge concludes with quotes from Berger v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:54 am
Sullivan. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:06 am
Within Samsung v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
Take, for example, Rayming Chang et al. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:53 am
Sullivan, 903 So.2d 1064 (2nd DCA 2005). [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
Babbitt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 1:18 pm
Bonner, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 3:18 pm
The constitutional analysis in the Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Matal v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 9:02 pm
Like in Bantam Books v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:02 am
This sounds remarkably like the “actual malice” standard of Times v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 6:05 am
Whether copyright will one day protect these works is unknown, but it is clear that – given the growing relevance (and popularity) of fictional worlds and franchising – these creations are more important than ever. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
In my experience, "plausibility" is not the issue these days. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
In early days, a few countries questioned the US about fair use. [read post]
