Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 561 - 580 of 21,968
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2023, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
Based on the court's determination that the plaintiff is an employee under the ABC test, the court would rely on this case law to support its decision that the plaintiff is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff was denied certain test accommodations in the past, and therefore failed the bar exam twice. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm by Allan Blutstein
  Notably, Judge Kavanaugh stated in a concurring opinion that the Court’s "four-factor test for awarding attorney’s fees in FOIA cases is inconsistent with FOIA’s text and structure, and impermissibly favors some FOIA plaintiffs over other equally deserving FOIA plaintiffs. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
The plaintiff who was born in another country was not aware that in the United States doctors recommend genetic testing for all women 35 years and older.And her doctor,nurse and two genetic counselors did not tell her of these tests. [read post]
25 May 2022, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
" Plaintiffs also fail to describe how masks and testing interfere with the students' religious practices of prayer, speech, and deed. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:00 am
The judge went on to note that, if the jury believed the Defendant’s evidence in this regard, then the refusal of the test by the Plaintiff would be undisputedly relevant. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 1:10 pm
" ["Defendants' failure to indicate the objective tests used to determine the range of motion in plaintiff's cervical spine was fatal to their efforts to establish a prima facie case for summary dismissal"].) [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Tests applied by courts in determining if claims of unlawful discrimination and, or, retaliation can survive a motion for summary judgmentLangton v Warwick Val. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:15 pm by Steven Cohen
Expert witness was challenged on the type of tests used to assess neuropsychological deficits after plaintiffs were exposed to lead paint. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 5:43 am
The plaintiffs alleged reverse discrimination had occurred, and the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:30 am by Laura Simons
Here, the plaintiff offered no evidence of what alternative course of action she would have taken had she been warned of the fact that Ford's seats had not been tested for a person of her size.The court found it significant that the plaintiff admitted she did not review the owner's manual until after she had purchased the car. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm by Jeff Klein
  When determining the admissibility of expert testimony, Pennsylvania still uses the Frye test of “general acceptance in the relevant scientific community applicable to novel scientific evidence” and does not use the Daubert standard. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:56 am by Mark Tabakman
  The Court observed that “argument … conflates the goal of [Defendant’s] operations with Plaintiffs’ specific duties, which Plaintiffs have not described. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Superior Court more specifically found that the trial court improperly erred as a matter of law by using standards applicable to the second prong of the bad faith test in its determination of whether or not the Plaintiff had satisfied the first prong of the bad faith test. [read post]