Search for: "Toni Stevens" Results 561 - 580 of 715
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm by justinsilverman
The case involved bio-weapons expert Steven Hatfill, who was reported as being named “a person of interest” in the 2001 anthrax attacks that killed five people. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the court’s ruling in Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
In Chevron, Justice John Paul Stevens recognized that deference is important because “[j]udges are not experts in the field and are not part of either of the political branches of government. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
  And in Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro interviews Helgi Walker, the Washington attorney appointed to argue as an amicus in the case. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans) for this blog, with other coverage coming from Nina Totenberg of NPR and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), both of whom also cover the decision in Walker. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:08 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
"Investigators and auditors had a productive quarter," said a report on the theft of Afghanistan aid by Steven Trent, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, or SIGAR. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist and Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, and First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:12 pm
In Legal Times, Tony Mauro writes, "Justices reject death penalty for child rape. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
At the BLT, Tony Mauro offers notes from a recent panel discussion held by C-SPAN to celebrate the launch of their new book, The Supreme Court. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie highlights the “tension between principle and practicality” in Chiafalo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Steven Mazie at The Economist predicts that Senate Republicans will dissolve the filibuster so that Trump can “have his way with the empty chair,” and speculates that Tuesday’s “vote may have changed retirement plans for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 83 and Stephen Breyer, 78, the elder liberals on a court that is destined to swing to the right. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
  Coverage comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Jordan Fabian of The Hill, while Dara Lind has an explainer on the case for Vox and Steven Mazie does the same for The Economist. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:59 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Steven Protherow at Boston University. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
At The National Law Journal (registration may be required), Tony Mauro tells how a Washington attorney landed his first Supreme Court argument by volunteering to represent a pro se petitioner; the court will hear Banister v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:10 am
  Steven Zipperstein, GC of Verizon Wireless, says his customers aren't asking about being able to bring other devices onto the Verizon network. [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:58 am by David Bernstein
I confirmed all this in an email conversation with Steven Cohen, the sociologist whose studies on American Jewish attachment to Israel have prompted much handwringing, including Beinart’s. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:05 am
I hit a similar mark in one of my first posts as a blogger, discussing how to find a personal injury attorney;In a similar vein, Tony Caggiano from the Orlando Injury Lawyer Blog reports: Federal Judge Acts on Improper Solicitation by Counsel. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:08 am by Allison Trzop
At The Economist, Steven Mazie notes that the Court this Term “struck down an unusually large number of statutes,” notably Section 3 of DOMA and Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]