Search for: "U. S. v. Strong"
Results 561 - 580
of 938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Dismissal of the small claims action thus achieves "substantial justice" consistent with substantive law principles (CCA 1807; see Crosswell v Crosswell, 21 Misc 3d 131[A], 873 N.Y.S.2d 510, 2008 NY Slip Op 52051[U] [2008]). [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:12 pm
Alden v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:04 pm
Mary’s University; Mary-Jo Mustoe (R. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:37 pm
" United States Telecom Assn. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:43 pm
U. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 3:32 pm
Wade’s Jane Roe (Norma McCorvey). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:40 am
The Larsen Decision The first was Larsen v Larsen (2022 NY Slip Op 32415(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County July 18, 2022]), in which Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Leon Ruchelsman considered and rejected a pre-answer dismissal challenge to a shareholder derivative suit based upon the suing minority shareholder’s alleged conflict of interest. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 2:04 am
A recent decision by a Manhattan trial judge in Holdrum Investments, N.V. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
As to the authorship requirement, Judge Smith looked to the Ninth Circuit’s prior decision in Aalmuhammed v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 10:11 pm
To complicate matters further, it seems that there are strong incentives for both approaches. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
" In this regard, appellant's reliance on People v. [read post]
Medical Treatment Patent Claims Held Patentable Subject Matter Under the Alice/Mayo Section 101 Test
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
In Burton v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
U. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 6:52 am
: Hamdi, Myth, and the Master’s Tools, 13 U. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:05 pm
Indeed, the individual right arguments were so strong that when the Supreme Court finally got around to announcing a new Second Amendment decision, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
The report was striking in its strong defense of the high court’s ethics. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
See 42 U. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The evidence against Davis was pretty strong. [read post]
