Search for: "U.S. Court of Federal Claims Bar Association" Results 561 - 580 of 3,959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
There is also a private right of action for shareholders to pursue claims for violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 in federal court. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Circuit is traditionally the most politicized of all the federal appeals courts, and brawls among its members are hardly unprecedented. [read post]
17 May 2022, 2:20 am by Hyman Phelps McNamara
  Types of matters include: Representing clients in False Claims Act investigations or in criminal investigations by the U.S. [read post]
16 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Gurbir Grewal
And I’d likely close by reassuring each of you in the defense bar that we’re not doing away with the White Paper and Wells processes, but rather streamlining them. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:59 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed and sent the case back to the district court, holding that at the very least, Congress did not intend to bar claims like Cochran’s from going first to the district court. [read post]
15 May 2022, 9:11 pm by The Regulatory Review Staff
January 21, 2021 | Reducing COVID-19 Behind Bars | Criminal justice experts warn that more needs to be done to mitigate coronavirus in U.S. jails and prisons. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Leo laid out a road map for Trump on the federal court system, potentially transforming the foundational understanding of rights in America. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The claim that such protests are acts of intimidation has been before the courts since the 19th century. [read post]
This can be especially useful for estates that are not required to file federal estate tax returns. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
This time, Miller’s dismissal request involved a claim that bar association membership voids citizenship. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Supreme Court took notice that Premier Rehab was subject to these laws because its receipt of Medicare and Medicaid payments qualified as federal financial assistance triggering their applicability. [read post]