Search for: "U.S. v. Battle*"
Results 561 - 580
of 613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm
Weiss, U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
” News Release, Office of the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
But in North Carolina, U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357 (2002) (pharmacy compounding); Pearson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Shattuck Professor at Harvard Law School and former U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In Rostker v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm
At the same time, the U.S. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
We are not imagining what obstacles lie ahead if we were to “codify Roe v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
In Lee v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Glenn Sulmasy, JAG and law professor at the US Coast Guard academy, and John Yoo have published a new article in the UCLA law review, "Challenges to Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror," 54 UCLALR 1815 (August 2007). [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 12:59 pm
Newsweek asserts that: The Supreme Court ruled last June, in a case involving some Gitmo prisoners, that U.S. courts should review the cases of detainees who deny being enemy combatants.Does that mean summoning military commanders away from the battlefield to testify? [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:40 am
Analysis The Pentagon’s new policy to control who will be detained as a terrorism suspect at the U.S. military prison at Bagram, Afghanistan, is based on a concept of the enemy that has not withstood legal tests in federal habeas courts in the wake of the Supreme Court’s constitutional habeas ruling in Boumediene v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Max, "Trademarks in the Veldt: Do Virtual Lawyers Dream of Electric Trademarks"Recommended Reading: Andrew Beckerman-Rodau, "The Problem With Intellectual Property Rights: Subject Matter Expansion"Recommended Reading: Ann Gilson Lelonde and Jerome Gilson, "Getting Real with Nontraditional Trademarks"Recommended Reading: Mostert and Schwimmer, "Notice and Takedown for Trademarks"Recommended Reading: 100th Anniversary Issue of The Trademark ReporterRecommended… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Democratic National Committee, the 2021 case in which the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 5:30 am
http://t.co/LGnic7vCGx -> Sheplers struck by data breach http://t.co/nIc6CykVFz -> The Internet of Things and Canadian Copyright Law http://t.co/tqQhKZx2RH -> CRTC “breached its duty to fairness” and “erred in law,” says commissioner Shoan http://t.co/4oYCgTx6LA -> Stanford Promises Not to Use Google Money for Privacy Research http://t.co/W8Hyw3jziM -> Fox News Sued Over Use of 9/11 Photo on Facebook http://t.co/cPbeWp394J -> Jane Ginsburg U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:43 pm
’” To view video of the relevant portion of Koh’s address to the Society, visithttp://fora.tv/v/10561. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:30 am
Under U.S. trademark law, this claim has some problems. [read post]
