Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2014, 12:18 pm
” In Burwell v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Wade but also Griswold v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Would the exemption the Court holds RFRA demands for employers with religiously grounded objections to the use of certain contraceptives extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah’s Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations (Christian Scientists, among others)? [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
., in one's coat). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:25 pm
Let’s talk about the decision in Riley v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
(See the policy reasoning in Renna v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:49 am
V. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 6:18 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:24 am
By way of example, in reaching a conclusion about the alleged likelihood of confusion between PLASTI DIP and FLEXIDIP, both for rubberized plastic coating products, the TTAB would ignore the different visual impressions of the marks and the different house marks on the packaging (Performix v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
From Renna v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Today’s Supreme Court decision in Bond v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Today’s Supreme Court decision in Bond v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 10:57 am
In Malphurs v. [read post]
17 May 2014, 10:57 am
In Malphurs v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:25 am
The employee alleged that the employer violated a statute prohibiting termination for "lawful activity" outside of work, but the Colorado Court of Appeals disagreed in Coats v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:45 am
Earlier this year, the Colorado Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of the 2013 Colorado Court of Appeals ruling in Coats v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:23 am
He believed this coating was consistent with marijuana use and asked the defendant when he had last smoked marijuana. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:24 pm
The Ninth Chamber of the General Court gave judgment today in a fierce battle over a Community trade mark application in Case T‑170/12, Beyond Retro Ltd v OHIM, the other party to the proceedings being a US company, S&K Garments, Inc., which was victorious in the Board of Appeal. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 7:33 am
Nanaimo Paving and Seal Coating Ltd. and Foster, 2007 BCSC 455, Morlan v. [read post]
