Search for: "US v. Cox" Results 561 - 580 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46)   Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
For those of us who teach and write about constitutional law, however, there is reason to linger over the opinion itself. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
  The Agency substantially revised the proxy rules after the DC Circuit's decision in SEC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
In late July 1974, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:13 am
There is also an analysis by Iris V. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
” Remember, we rely exclusively on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Jane noted that the plaintiffs in Klayman v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cox Fibernet Va., Inc., 602 F.3d 1325, 1336-37 (Fed. [read post]