Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 561 - 580 of 8,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ltd., saying there was no court order for Philips to violate. link: http://www.law360.com/articles/719323/reed-smith-philips-shake-sanctions-bid-in-trade-secret-rowAlso of interestBut Philips argued that all of the information it used in its state court suit came from publicly available or permissible sources, calling the motion no more than an attempt to keep facts in the federal case from making it into the state case. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
” In February 2013, Smith applied for a conditional use permit to build a 300–foot–tall cellular tower in Washington County. [read post]
21 May 2021, 1:41 pm
  Indeed, the principal conflict between Judge Murguia's opinion and Judge Smith's concurrence is whether the "and" interpretation makes another statutory provision surplusage; Judge Murguia says it doesn't, whereas Judge Smith says it does, but that it doesn't really matter. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 1:24 am
Itochu argued that section 15(3) did not apply, and that the court should use its powers under section 18 of the Act to appoint a panel of three arbitrators. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:55 am by Walter James
Wright testified that he did not believe the particular schematic was ever used or completed by ARKLA. [read post]