Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Minnesota"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,442
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
District Court for the Central District of California found that Giganews was not liable for the infringing activities of its users. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
Must the federal district courts follow the decisions of federal courts of appeal; must they follow only those decisions of federal appellate courts in the appellate district to which they belong? [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 10:21 am
Minnesota and Oregon have also joined in Washington’s suit, while the State of Hawaii is pursuing a separate case. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
Ruth Okediji, University of Minnesota Law SchoolProf. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:44 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
Covidien then removed the action to federal court; however, the federal district court sent the action back to state court because of UFRF’s 11th Amendment immunity. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 8:41 pm
On February 1, 2017, State of Minnesota joined Washington State as plaintiff. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
The states of Washington and Minnesota brought a legal challenge to Executive Order 13769, “Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States,” which imposed a 90-day ban on the entry into the United States of aliens from seven primarily Muslim countries. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
Bush in 2003, placed a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the executive order until full arguments in the case brought against the Trump administration by Washington State and Minnesota could be heard. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
To the extent the TRO extends geographically beyond Washington and Minnesota, the court won’t restrict its effect. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
"Whether the states had standing to bring this case was addressed in the following:The [federal] Government argues that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the States have no standing to sue. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
In short, the Ninth Circuit held that the states (Washington and Minnesota) had standing and met the requirements for a preliminary injunction (styled a temporary restraining order in the district court). [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:19 pm
’s program for admitting refugees into the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:15 pm
News:The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a unanimous ruling in the case of State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm
Trump, in Massachusetts District Court here). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:59 am
Indeed, the case itself involves a State (Washington, later joined by Minnesota) suing a federal actor (the President). [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 10:27 am
It resulted in over 100 lawsuits across the country, which were consolidated into one multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 8:47 am
The Court found a likelihood the States of Washington and Minnesota would prevail on the merits challenging the Executive Order and set an expedited briefing schedule. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
The Justice Department promptly filed an emergency request to stay the district court order pending appeal to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
