Search for: "United States v. Best et al"
Results 561 - 580
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:47 am
An Introduction to Norovirus The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [5, 9, 13, 31] According to a relatively recent article in the New England Journal of Medicine: The Norwalk agent was the first virus that was identified as causing gastroenteritis in humans, but recognition of its… [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:55 am
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 8:07 pm
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one… [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
Federation of Labour, et al. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 6:52 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today released its decision in Information and Privacy Commissioner et al v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:50 am
Meade: a third day of CCTV-broadcasted proceedings in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 6:08 am
United States Dep’t of Labor Bull. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
What exposes his permissive agenda is the passage on page 28 in which he disagrees with Judge Posner, or at least with the way he, I believe, misunderstands Judge Posner:"Some commentators and some courts reason that -- as a matter of contract -- the F/RAND commitment is an agreement that damages are adequate compensation for infringement and therefore an injunction should not be granted under the Supreme Court's standard in eBay Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2013, 7:23 pm
As we meet for these pretrial proceedings in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:03 pm
” Most of the surface waters of the United States will fail the generic E. coli standard either persistently, predictably during certain times of the year or intermittently. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:06 am
Alsup last week ruled Checker (nee Ernest Evans) may pursue a $500 million trademark infringement claim against defendants Hewlett-Packard and Palm, Inc.The case, Ernest Evans et al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
The course description approved by the faculty is ambiguous at best, and meaningless at worst. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:33 pm
Two developments in Hatim et al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
Commentary: this case is a worthy reminder to agency staff that “best practices” dictate that what agency staff states publically and in writing, including emails, needs to be carefully considered for its CEQA implications. [read post]
