Search for: "United States v. Blanket"
Results 561 - 580
of 911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
United States, 518 U.S. 81, 113 (1996). [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 10:20 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
For example, in its response brief in Al Hajj v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 9:23 pm
On appeal to the United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, International Outdoor argued that the district court erred when it concluded that the company’s injuries would not be redressable. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 5:26 pm
” The Court, citing case law from the United States Supreme Court, specifically quashed arguments brought by the insurance industry supporting this ban: We reject the contention of amicus curiae that, even if the statute is construed as a prophylactic ban on all solicitation, it is constitutional under the rational employed in Ohralik v. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am
In A v United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that ‘the broader an [MP’s] immunity, the more compelling must be its justification in order that it can be said to be compatible with the Convention’ ([78]). [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 10:54 am
Other Laws and Regulations Relevant to Wearables Currently in the United States, three states – Illinois, Texas and Washington – have implemented laws that regulate the collection and retention of biometric identifiers. [read post]
21 May 2021, 10:20 am
The challengers are a group of U.S. citizens whose smartphones and laptops were searched at the border while they were re-entering the United States from traveling abroad. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
United States, 408 U.S. 606 (1972). [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:47 pm
From People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:52 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
Our organization ended up voting to sue the Attorney General of the United States to be relieved from the gag order so that we could share our story with Congress while the Patriot Act was up for renewal. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 9:34 am
Our organization ended up voting to sue the Attorney General of the United States to be relieved from the gag order so that we could share our story with Congress while the Patriot Act was up for renewal. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:23 pm
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008"Prisoners' voting rights (Hirst v UK)47. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:30 am
Later that morning, in the courthouse, another colleague who defends many clients in handgun cases happily told me that the Supreme Court that morning had affirmed the United States Court of Appeals ruling invalidating the District of Columbia's virtual blanket ban on the possession of an operable handgun in one's home. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:32 pm
V. [read post]
