Search for: "United States v. Hughes"
Results 561 - 580
of 924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 10:45 pm
However, religious authorities have nowhere near the influence they have in other jurisdictions such as in the United States, as evidenced by the fact that the religious premises restriction has recently been removed by an amendment to the Equality Act 2010. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 12:38 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:05 am
Statutes at Large, v. 8, at 444) was terminated by the United States because of Russia’s discriminatory immigration policies. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:06 pm
Many of these are drawn from research for the book Ballot Battles: The History of Disputed Elections in the United States as well as work done for the American Law Institute’s Principles of Law—Election Administration project. [read post]
26 May 2018, 3:01 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that lost profits arising from prohibited combinations occurring outside of the United States are categorically unavailable in cases in which patent infringement is proven under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 5:41 pm
As Lord Browne-Wilkinson said in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex p Pierson [1998] AC 539: A power conferred by Parliament in general terms is not to be taken to authorise the doing of acts by the donee of the power which adversely affect the legal rights of the citizen or the basic principles on which the law of the United Kingdom is based unless the statute conferring the power makes it clear that such was the intention of Parliament. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
United States In an interesting derogation from US copyright laws the Library of Congress granted an exception to the DMCA’s principles preventing the circumvention of technological measures in the archiving of software. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 4:27 pm
’” (Similar sentiments about the role of NGOs can be seen in Steel and Morris v United Kingdom (2005) 41 EHRR 403, [89] and Vides Aizsardz? [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
This year's was on blue-sky laws, with just a glimpse of New Deal securities regulation and the Hughes Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:31 pm
The case is currently before the United States Courts of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:24 am
On Wednesday, the United States and the European Union warned Beijing that it must respect the upcoming merits decision in the Philippines v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:18 pm
The first case, United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am
Cody linked to the recently published report from Lorenzo Vidino and Seamus Hughes of the Program on Extremism at George Washington University entitled ISIS in America: From Retweets to Raqqa. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 8:06 am
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 2:29 pm
Supp. 2d 109, 115 (D.D.C. 2004) (citing United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Copyright protection in the United States was first championed by a group of authors, including Noah Webster and Joel Barlow.10 In response, a committee in the Continental Congress — consisting of James Madison, Hugh Williamson, and Ralph Izard — drafted a resolution that recommended the states pass their own copyright laws.11 Twelve of the thirteen states had passed such legislation by 1786. [read post]
