Search for: "United States v. Parker"
Results 561 - 580
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:03 am
The Second Circuit had previously implied that such a limitation exists in Parker v. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
United States, 116 U. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
” Parole in place allows noncitizens who enter the United States without authorization to remain for a specific period of time. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:29 pm
United States, No 04-41196 (5th Cir., Oct. 11, 2006), the court held that a private-to-private transfer for economic development that was accomplished as part of a "carefully considered development plan" passed muster. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
Carter v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:21 am
Citing its own February 2010 opinion in Litwin v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:30 am
Parker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Houghton Chemical Corp., 434 Mass. 624, 751 N.E.2d 848 (2001) (acetone and other chemicals in 55-gallon drums); Parker v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
Bridges 13-657Issue: Whether the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution allows States to tax goods distributed by out-of-state wholesalers more heavily than goods distributed by in-state wholesalers. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:43 am
In a similar case, the Delaware Appellate court affirmed the conviction (Parker v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 3:46 am
State scope of practice limitations. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:46 am
The classic example is Parker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 4:16 am
March 5, 2009) ("bald" manufacturing violation claim dismissed); Parker v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
Ultimately, Bilski v Kappos says more about how patent law is made in the United States than about patentable subject matter. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 11:18 pm
The first was United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
CaldwellDocket: 10-622Issue(s): (1) Whether a binding agreement among multiple states and private companies is immunized from antitrust scrutiny under the state-action immunity doctrine of Parker v. [read post]
