Search for: "W. T. Grant Company, in the Matter of" Results 561 - 580 of 936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm by Blue Blog
PRACTICAL TIP: It doesn’t matter whether you are a prime contractor, a specialty subcontractor, or a material supplier, you should thoroughly investigate the other party’s credit worthiness BEFORE you sign the contract. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
So that brings us to the legal question: Should Microsoft’s motion to quash the warrant be granted? [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
The district court granted the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Doesn’t believe patent promotes innovation either, where patent mills are shaking down companies systematically. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
After a hearing, the trial court granted dismissal of the harmful access by computer claim but denied dismissal of the remaining claims. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:38 am
After a hearing, the trial court granted dismissal of the harmful access by computer claim but denied dismissal of the remaining claims.Pickens v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:55 am by Joy Waltemath
Giving a male general manager a chance to put before a jury his claim that he was terminated based on lobbying by a female human resources employee whose romantic and sexual advances he had repeatedly rebuffed, the appeals court vacated in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the employer (Velazquez-Perez v Developers Diversified Realty Corp, May 23, 2014, Kayatta, W). [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Ronald Mann
Responding to the disarray in the court of appeals’ decision, the Supreme Court granted review. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
“[I]t bears mentioning the unfortunate impact that this case will have on employees working for companies in this circuit,” Judge McKeague wrote in dissent. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:12 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting the EEOC’s request for judicial notice, the court found that the regulation was persuasive and should be followed here. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
    He also pointed out that [i]t is equally true that the Application implicates Twitter's due process rights under the 5th Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 4:01 am by Andrew Frisch
Following a jury verdict in favor of the defendant-employer below, the trial court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, holding that—as a matter of law—defendant had failed to satisfy its burden of proof regarding the executive exemption. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”The court did grant the Beastie Boys leave to add a claim of infringement of an additional, fifth song based on evidence found in discovery, almost 2 years after the case began. [read post]