Search for: "WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE" Results 561 - 580 of 790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
In the end, not a single Republican elector switched, which surprised no one, since the Republican Party had definitively closed ranks around Trump as soon as it became clear that GOP voters were sticking with him after the “Access Hollywood” video episode.Intriguingly, lead counsel for the faithless electors is none other than Lawrence Lessig, who presumably hopes that unbound electors will stop Trump in 2020. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Stevens is a generation or two removed from most of his colleagues; when Roberts served as a law clerk to William H. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
Stevens is a generation or two removed from most of his colleagues; when Roberts served as a law clerk to William H. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:40 pm by Amy Howe
Suggesting that it “would be an understatement in the extreme to call the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 1:11 pm by Adam Feldman
Just behind these three with eight briefs apiece are New York solicitor general Barbara Underwood and Williams & Connolly’s Lisa Blatt. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
At Reuters, Lawrence Hurley reports that “[t]he justices will hear the Trump administration’s appeals of three lower court rulings – in California, New York and the District of Columbia – that found that the president violated a U.S. law called the Administrative Procedure Act in seeking to kill DACA. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria, heard 4 – 5 November 2013. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the justices’ relative power over time, comparing cases that were decided by a one-vote margin, and concluding that Chief Justice William Rehnquist is “the clear leader. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:29 am by Joshua Matz
At Greenwire, Lawrence Hurley argues that “Justice was blind to some facts” in the Court’s recent Sackett v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
The Associated Press reports that the justices ruled that “the sentencing guidelines can’t be challenged for being too vague since they only offer a guide to how courts can impose sentences within an acceptable range. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:37 am by Tom Kosakowski
Brawer (Western Michigan University); and William T. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
”  Additional coverage of Wednesday’s oral argument comes from Joan Biskupic at Reuters, Tom Curry at NBC News, Sahil Kapur at Talking Points Memo, and Mary Troyan at the Montgomery Advertiser (h/t Rick Hasen). [read post]