Search for: "Washington v. US et al" Results 561 - 580 of 1,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 2:05 pm
U.S., 07-776), and it refused to hear an appeal by five Washington, D.C., residents who had wanted to take part in the challenge to the city’s ban on handgun possession (Parker, et al., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:53 am
Radley, et al., Off-Label Prescribing Among Office-Based Physicians, 166 Arch. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 2:40 pm by Jason Rantanen
Almeling et al., A Statistical Analysis of Trade Secret Litigation in Federal Court, 45 Gonzaga L. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm by Christa Culver
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper)   US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v… [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:38 pm by Nadia Kayyali
As the Times article points out, the issue of wiretapping privileged communications was at stake in Amnesty et. al v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 12:10 pm by Tom Lamb
  These bills would permit manufacturers of generic drugs to provide additional warnings about their drugs in the same manner that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows for brand name manufacturers. (5/15/12) _____________________________________________________________________ The Pliva, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
Observers in the Circuit's Ceremonial Courtroom - No. 20 - on Wednesday will be watching to see how soon Citizens United comes up in the hearing and how the judges react in two cases with the same name: SpeechNow.org., et al., v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Slezak et al, Maryland Accident Law Blog, November 23, 2012 Maryland Law Requires Medical Malpractice Plaintiff to File the Claim With the State Before Filing Suit - Haskins v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Plaintiff, -against- LESTER YOUNG, RAYMOND MAR, MARILYN HARRIS, AKA MARILYN SELLER, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al,  the argument succeeds for plaintiff. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:06 pm by William Ford
Robert Loeb and Sarah Grant argued that the decision of the Eastern District of Virginia in Al Shimari, et. al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:48 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
James Sensenbrenner et al., who filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in this case.] [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 8:16 am
On Thursday, the Justices are scheduled to examine in their private Conference the case of Kiyemba, et al., v. [read post]